|
|
Volume 7, Number 2 The main point - and the most difficult one in the Author's opinion - is not to anchor one's own thinking (and the patient) to one single developmental level, but to try to explore the ways in which archaic functioning and early defences seep through the oedipal cross-roads, deforming it and in their turn being distorted as well. The problem thus regards, on the one hand, the theoretical and clinical discrimination of the confusive weft between the various developmental levels, and, on the other hand, the integration within oneself and within the object relationships of the different areas of psychic functioning that have been deeply split and disorganized on account of the incestuous acting. The Author further remarks that one of its most devastating effects is the consequent failure to differentiate, both at the intrapsychic and the interpersonal dimension, aspects of sensorial tenderness from the erotic. The last part of the paper begins with an observation on socio-cultural change such as the abolishing of differences between adults and the young, between masculine and feminine, and the progressive weakening of the value of gender identity and individuality. Attention is then focused on the alteration of defences: from repression to splitting and denial; and, furthermore, to the blurred boundaries with so-called normality and with the primitive defensive organizations of non-integration and ambiguity - a condition in which the persistence of pre-oedipal defences strongly mortgages the oedipus solution. Within this context of a generalized tendency of regressive defences towards indifferentiation, in which the oedipal crux seems slackened if not avoided altogether, the Author wonders whether perhaps incest provokes less anxiety, less guilt and less horror, but no less damage. |